Re: DLRs
Antony Stone <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Open Source IT |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday 17 August 2019 at 15:42:38, Antony Stone wrote:
> So, it seems that kannel did receive a DLR with type=1, but then said "got
> DLR but could not find message or was not interested in it".
>
> I've found https://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2011-July/016176.html
> which addresses this, and it looks like suggestion 1 is my problem. I do
> have two machines running kannel, each with a connection to my upstream
> carrier (for load balancing / high availability), and I have no control
> over which connection that carrier will use to send me messages or DLRs.
Indeed - if I turn off one of my kannel instances, so there is only one running
to either send or receive message to/from my SMSC provider, I get DLR status=8
when the message is sent (with the phone turned off), and I then get DLR
status=1 once the phone is turned on and the message is delivered.
> It looks like I'm going to have to look into using a database for my DLR
> storage. I do happen to have a MariaDB Galera cluster available, but I've
> read https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45486238/kannel-sqlbox that the
> Debian packaged installation of kannel doesn't work with MySQL, only if
> you build kannel from source.
>
> Does anyone know whether this is still true (kannel 1.4.4, kannel-sqlbox
> 0.7.2) for the Debian 9 Stretch packages?
Antony.
--
I want to build a machine that will be proud of me.
- Danny Hillis, creator of The Connection Machine
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.