Re: Port Status Check Configuration

Tino Hendricks <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.monitoring.monit.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hey, I don’t know what your servers or networks are busy with when monit fails. But if I were you I would try to find out why monit reports failure and nmap does not.
See my suggestions in my last mail.

> Am 29.08.2017 um 06:08 schrieb Rizal Muttaqin <[email protected]>:
> 
> So basically the default timeout (5 seconds) is too fast?
> 
> Right now the failed-succeded interval back to 5 minutes again http://imgur.com/a/FithN
> 
> 
> On 28/08/17 17:09, Tino Hendricks wrote:
>> Then I think the only possibility is you’re running into timeouts.
>> I’d play around with some values here
>> https://mmonit.com/monit/documentation/monit.html#CONNECTION-TESTS
>> 
>> And maybe let a ping, traceroute or recurring nmap running in parallel for testing purposes so you can be _sure_ that it’s a monit problem (and not a temporary network problem that went away by the time your checkscript kicks in).
>> 
>> Tino
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Am 28. August 2017 um 12:05:32, Rizal Muttaqin ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) schrieb:
>> 
>>> Yep, the Nmap script was made for double-checking functionality.
>>> Normally, I have to check network port status manually after monit sent
>>> an alert. I need to automate it with Nmap script especially when I'm not
>>> online. What I'm not sure why there were different report between monit
>>> alert and Nmap output file. Nmap never tell me other report beside open
>>> status:
>>>  ####################
>>> Thu Aug 24 16:07:23 UTC 2017
>>> 80/tcp open
>>> 843/tcp open
>>> 2121/tcp open
>>> 8080/tcp open
>>> Thu Aug 24 20:46:23 UTC 2017
>>> 80/tcp open
>>> 843/tcp open
>>> 2121/tcp open
>>> 8080/tcp open
>>> Fri Aug 25 13:04:42 UTC 2017
>>> 80/tcp open
>>> 843/tcp open
>>> 2121/tcp open
>>> 8080/tcp open
>>> Fri Aug 25 21:11:23 UTC 2017
>>> 80/tcp open
>>> 843/tcp open
>>> 2121/tcp open
>>> 8080/tcp open
>>> Sun Aug 27 07:49:19 UTC 2017
>>> 80/tcp open
>>> 843/tcp open
>>> 2121/tcp open
>>> 8080/tcp open
>>> Mon Aug 28 00:33:10 UTC 2017
>>> 80/tcp open
>>> 843/tcp open
>>> 2121/tcp open
>>> 8080/tcp open
>>> #######################
>>>    On 28/08/17 16:37, Tino Hendricks wrote:
>>>> Rizal,
>>>> 
>>>> looking at your script I think you mixed up functionality:
>>>> The check if a network port is open or not is done with the "if failed port…“ statements. The „start/stop program“ is meant for the case where these checks fail and you tell monit to „restart“.
>>>> So if you’re not happy with the built-in checks that monit offers
>>>> https://mmonit.com/monit/documentation/monit.html#CONNECTION-TESTS
>>>> you need to put your checkport.sh in the test-part of monit’s config.
>>>> 
>>>> Something like
>>>> 
>>>> check program checkport.shwith path /opt/monit/scripts/checkport.sh
>>>> if status != 0 then alert
>>>> 
>>>> more examples:
>>>> https://mmonit.com/monit/documentation/monit.html#PROGRAM-STATUS-TEST
>>>> 
>>>> HTH
>>>> 
>>>> Tino
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Am 28. August 2017 um 05:25:49, Rizal Muttaqin ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) schrieb:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's my first experience to play with monit. So, basically I have two
>>>>> server with several services running there and I want monit to check
>>>>> whether some ports (relative to that service) are listening or not with
>>>>> monit. The configuration relatively simple, monit check port status,
>>>>> when failed monit will start a nmap script bash script and send the
>>>>> status to the file. Plus, in same function, monit will send alert in 5
>>>>> cycles.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The problem is when monit send an connections failed alert then in the
>>>>> next 5 minutes monit send again an connection suceeded alert, when I
>>>>> check the nmap log script there's no port failed (filtered or
>>>>> close)/port status is always open. I've checked manually with nmap when
>>>>> monit send failed alert but the result is always the same: port status
>>>>> is open:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why monit do always send failure alert when the port is open, and why in
>>>>> the next 5 minutes interval I see connection succeeded? I've changed set
>>>>> daemon to 30, and then the alert interval become 1.5 minutes, and revert
>>>>> daemon to be 300, but now the alert interval is always be 1.5 minutes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is my /etc/monitrc configuration for first server (another server
>>>>> configuration script exactly the same)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> #####################################################
>>>>> 
>>>>> set daemon 300 # check services at 300 seconds (5 minutes)
>>>>> intervals
>>>>> 
>>>>> check host somehost with address somehost.com
>>>>> start program = "/opt/monit/scripts/checkport.sh start"
>>>>> stop program = "/opt/monit/scripts/checkport.sh stop"
>>>>> if failed port 80 then restart
>>>>> if failed port 843 then restart
>>>>> if failed port 2121 then restart
>>>>> if failed port 8080 then restart
>>>>> if failed port 80 for 5 cycles then alert
>>>>> if failed port 843 for 5 cycles then alert
>>>>> if failed port 2121 for 5 cycles then alert
>>>>> if failed port 8080 for 5 cycles then alert
>>>>> alert [email protected] with reminder on 5 cycles
>>>>> 
>>>>> ########################################################
>>>>> 
>>>>> and this is my /opt/monit/checkport.sh script
>>>>> 
>>>>> ########################################################
>>>>> 
>>>>> #!/bin/bash
>>>>> 
>>>>> case $1 in
>>>>> start)
>>>>> nmap -p 80,843,2121,8080 -P0 somehost.com -oG-| awk 'NR>=6 &&
>>>>> NR<=9 {print $1 "\t" $2}' | cat >> /opt/monit/log/checkedport | date >>
>>>>> /opt/monit/log/checkedport & echo $! > /var/run/checkport.pid ;
>>>>> ;;
>>>>> stop)
>>>>> pkill -F /var/run/checkport.pid ;;
>>>>> *)
>>>>> echo "usage: checkport {start|stop}" ;;
>>>>> esac
>>>>> exit 0
>>>>> #########################################################
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe:
>>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
>>>  
> 


-- 
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.