Re: "check now" command

SZÉPE Viktor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.monitoring.monit.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you.

While doing "monit validate" I've received as many alert emails as  
there are checks.
Can we do something about it?


Idézem/Quoting [email protected]:

> Hi,
>
> you can use "monit validate" to trigger the monitoring cycle and  
> collect status.
>
> The "check program" will have however one cycle delay, as monit  
> currently collects the result the next cycle after the program is  
> executed (to not block other tests).
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
>
>> On 31 Jul 2018, at 10:31, SZÉPE Viktor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Usually I need "check now" when I am debugging an unknown problem.
>>
>> Idézem/Quoting Guillaume François <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> I would prefer something like:
>>> check every 5 cycles when ok
>>> check every 2 cycles when failling
>>>
>>> check for quick recovery
>>>
>>> or the way around (prefer to remove as fast as possible problematic server
>>> from pool)
>>>
>>> check every 1 cycle when ok
>>> check every 10 cycle when failing
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently this kind of thing can be achieve with two  excluding checks  and
>>> enabling the other when "failling")
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mar. 31 juil. 2018 à 09:09, Roose, Marco <[email protected]> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> I very much like that idea!
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Marco Roose
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: monit-general <monit-general-bounces+marco.roose=
>>>> [email protected]> On Behalf Of SZÉPE Viktor
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 10:29 PM
>>>> To: monit-general <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: "check now" command
>>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> I am a happy monit user.
>>>>
>>>> Sometime I face a situation when a check has a temporary problem.
>>>>
>>>>  # Number of resolvers
>>>>  check program network_resolv
>>>>     with path "/usr/local/sbin/server-integrity.sh -c RES -r 3" every
>>>> 33 cycles
>>>>    group integrity
>>>>    if status != 0 then alert
>>>>
>>>> So if it goes to "failed" status it would be nice to have a dedicated
>>>> "check now" command that would evaluate the status of the check again.
>>>> Work-arounds may exist but I am looking for a straight-forwards solution.
>>>> (currently I issue monit reload for that with is not optimal)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés / Running your application
>>>> https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md
>>>> --
>>>> ügyelet/hotline: +36-20-4242498  [email protected]  skype: szepe.viktor
>>>> Budapest, III. kerület
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe:
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe:
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
>>> Version: 3.1
>>> GCS/IT d(+) s++:- a C++$ ULC(+)>+++$ !P--- L+>$ !E---? W+++$ !N* !o-- K--?
>>> w(+) !O---? !M- !V--? PS+? !PE Y+ PGP++>+++ !t-- !5 !X- R(+)>++* tv-? b(-)
>>> DI !D- G(+)>+ e+++ h--() r->$ y?*
>>> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>>
>>
>>
>> SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés / Running your application
>> https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md
>> --
>> ügyelet/hotline: +36-20-4242498  [email protected]  skype: szepe.viktor
>> Budapest, III. kerület
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general



SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés / Running your application
https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md
-- 
ügyelet/hotline: +36-20-4242498  [email protected]  skype: szepe.viktor
Budapest, III. kerület






-- 
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.