RE: Re: trouble with responsetime keyword
[email protected] Wed, 04 May 2022 12:31:53 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.monitoring.monit.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, sorry, "operator-agnostic" is the right term I can not found "make the error message operator-agnostic (greater | lower)" With regards, Lutz > -----ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] > Gesendet: 04.05.2022 09:27 Uhr > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: trouble with responsetime keyword > Yep, your point about the error message is true, we've modified it already: bitbucket.org/tildeslash/monit/commits/87b6d16129451ebc0794b28791be77503a3415f1 > > Best regards, > The M/Monit team > > > On 4. 5. 2022, at 8:30, Lutz Mader wrote: > > > > Hello M/Monit Support, > > the state is the right state. > > > >> Similarly to the other statement, the "if failed" rule defines the normal state, that triggers the error if the expression is not true. > > > > The message text in the log does not fit, from my point of view, if the > > comparsion was changed from "<" to ">". > > I think something like "doesn't match limit" fit better than "exceeded > > the limit" as long as the limit can be less than. > > > > But Noel should be happy now. > > > > No matter, the responsetime will be tested now, > > with regards, > > Lutz > > > > > -----ursprüngliche Nachricht Ende-----