Re: Mozilla and UUAG compliance

Jon Gunderson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.accessibility
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sure it is something I have been meaning to do for awhile.

What do you have in mind?  Where would you see the conformance claim being posted?

Jon


---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:43:32 -0400
>From: David Bolter <[email protected]>  
>Subject: Re: Mozilla and UUAG compliance  
>To: Jon Gunderson <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]
>
>   Jon, excellent point!
>
>   Want to do a review?
>
>   D
>   On 4/21/09 2:13 PM, Jon Gunderson wrote:
>
> One of the goals of the Firefox Accessibility Extension was to add the UAAG 1.0 required features to Firefox.
>
> I never did a formal review of FF + Firefox Accessibility Extension against UAAG 1.0, but I believe most requirements are satisfied when used in conjunctions with the accessibility extenison.
>
> http://firefox.cita.uiuc.edu
>
> There may be also be other extensions that also support compliance with UAAG, like Firevox.
>
> Jon
>  
>
> ---- Original message ----
>  
>
> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:28:32 -0400
> From: David Bolter <[email protected]> 
> Subject: Re: Mozilla and UUAG compliance 
> To: Frank Hecker <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> As far as I know, Mozilla is not actively participating in the
> development of the UAAG 2.0.  While at CSUN I spoke with James Allan and
> Jeanne Spellman from the W3C, along with other browser developers, and
> there are concerns over the 'do-ability' of the specification as it
> currently stands.  We should and hopefully will provide more feedback to
> the UAAG group soon... but with WAI-ARIA, and other FF accessibility
> development, UAAG participation/feedback might fall by the wayside.
>
> I don't know how FF rates relative to other browsers in terms of UAAG 1.0
>
> David
>
> On 4/21/09 9:06 AM, Frank Hecker wrote:
>    
>
> Scott Rippon left the following comment on my blog post about the
> high-level accessibility strategy: "How does Firefox rate against the
> W3C User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0? Should compliance with
> these guidelines be in the strategy? Is Mozilla participating in the
> development of the UAAG 2.0?"
>
> Could any of you comment on this?
>
> Frank
>
>      
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-accessibility mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-accessibility
>    
>
> Jon Gunderson, Ph.D.
> Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility
> Disability Resources and Educational Services
>
> Rehabilitation Education Center
> Room 86
> 1207 S. Oak Street
> Champaign, Illinois 61821
>
> Voice: (217) 244-5870
>
> WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/
> WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/
>
>
>  
Jon Gunderson, Ph.D.
Coordinator Information Technology Accessibility
Disability Resources and Educational Services

Rehabilitation Education Center
Room 86
1207 S. Oak Street
Champaign, Illinois 61821

Voice: (217) 244-5870

WWW: http://www.cita.uiuc.edu/
WWW: https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/jongund/www/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.