Re: aria-describedat?
Alexander Surkov <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:42:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+epNsejYx9BTdds-sA2iVmBCjCWMqE0iZmunfPe-Z-og8t7MA@mail.gmail.com> |
> If so, what would be the best way to go about actually implementing > it? Presumably there are gatekeepers (e.g. Asa Dotzler) who have an > influence on what does or does not go into Firefox's chrome. What's > the procedure for getting such gatekeepers on side? What's the > procedure for getting their feedback on the design? I think file a bug, cc gatekeepers and ask them for feedback. Alex. On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis > <[email protected]> wrote: >> With that in mind, would there be any interest in tackling: >> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=longdesc >> >> Perhaps along the lines of: >> >> http://my.opera.com/chaals/blog/tell-me-more >> >> Or even a more basic implementation as in iCab and Opera? >> >> I don't see why a name change should make a difference here, but if >> there's no interest in implementing browser UI for @longdesc, would >> there be any interest in implementing such UI for @aria-describedat? > > OK, so disappointing radio silence so far; allow me to push the > conversation in a slightly different direction. > > Let's say that to get a universally accessible hidden long description > link we came up with a design including an accessibility API mapping, > a context menu action, a hover effect, and a button somewhere in the > browser chrome that appears when long descriptions are present in the > page and provides access to long descriptions to keyboard/switch users > who can't hover over images. > > Is it socio-politically feasible for someone (let's say me - for the > sake of argument) to implement this in Firefox so that all Firefox > users will have access to long descriptions? > > If so, what would be the best way to go about actually implementing > it? Presumably there are gatekeepers (e.g. Asa Dotzler) who have an > influence on what does or does not go into Firefox's chrome. What's > the procedure for getting such gatekeepers on side? What's the > procedure for getting their feedback on the design? > > Would a name change to the attribute make the slightest bit of > difference to the feasibility of actually doing this? > > If there's no chance that Mozilla would even consider adding ambient > features to Firefox's user interface to support long descriptions for > all, then we're wasting our time discussing this. > > -- > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis