Re: IPC plans

Eitan Isaacson <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:04:57 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.accessibility
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This looks great! Thanks for posting. More below.

On 03/25/2014 02:33 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> unresolved issues:
> - xpcom API should it be one tree or tree per process? afaik AccessFoo
>   assumes tree per process and our test suite assumes one tree for
> everything, so we need to reconsile this somehow, but I'm not sure it
> needs to happen immediately.

Ultimately, if we can get away with it performance wise, it would be
nice to use a single tree in AccessFu, this will make life easier. Also,
what are the plans for events? The current system has events only firing
in their respective process.

Cheers,
 Eitan.