Re: IPC plans

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 01:04:57PM -0700, Eitan Isaacson wrote:
> This looks great! Thanks for posting. More below.
> 
> On 03/25/2014 02:33 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > unresolved issues:
> > - xpcom API should it be one tree or tree per process? afaik AccessFoo
> >   assumes tree per process and our test suite assumes one tree for
> > everything, so we need to reconsile this somehow, but I'm not sure it
> > needs to happen immediately.
> 
> Ultimately, if we can get away with it performance wise, it would be
> nice to use a single tree in AccessFu, this will make life easier. Also,
> what are the plans for events? The current system has events only firing
> in their respective process.

Well, we need them for platform events so if you want them I see no
problem giving them to you, we just need to coordinate changes so
AccessFoo doesn't get broken.

Trev

> 
> Cheers,
>  Eitan.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev-accessibility mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-accessibility