Re: Seeking Qt port maintainer or Qt removal
"morbit _at_ cdn.gs" <"morbit _at_ cdn.gs"@ywing.aoltw.net> Wed, 04 Sep 2002 20:19:23 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.qt,gmane.comp.mozilla.builds,gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.unix |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Christopher Seawood wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
>
>> There aren't much changes required to get the Qt port working again,
>> there are only two major changes which are easy to fix (if someone has
>> Qt installed).
>
>
> Compiling != working port. I'm looking beyond just getting the Qt port
> compiling again. I'm looking for someone to "own" this port; to be the
> "go to" person, so to speak. Qt bugs have had a tendency to bounce off
> of either Browser-General and/or Build Config and then disappear into
> some other component where they rot because the Qt port isn't a priority
> for those component owners. So obviously, there should be someone for
> whom the Qt port *is* a priority otherwise I'm not seeing the point of
> having the code in the tree. We need to get better at purging code from
> the tree that regularly breaks every few months due to neglect and isn't
> discovered until a significant time period after the bustage occurred.
>
> Ideally, the maintainer would be someone that builds & tests the Qt port
> regularly. They should make sure that the port actually implemented a
> full set of features, not just stubs, that would make the port a
> reasonable alternative to the other toolkit ports (gtk, gtk2 & xlib). If
> the Qt port doesn't implement a comparable set of features that the
> other ports do, then what's the point of keeping it around?
>
>> Is there a BugZilla-bug like "Seeking new owner for the Qt-port" yet ?
>
>
> Nope. As we do not have any toolkit specific components, I don't see
> the point in filing a bug about this issue. Well, short of one to
> remove the code.
>
> - cls
>
there are interested parties in n.p.m.qt, whether anyone wants to
maintain I don't know, I'd be happy to be able to build it at least once
--
cdn
Orbit3 lives [http://orbit.cdn.gs/]
--
Mozilla end-user questions should be directed to:
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.general
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.win32
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.mac
snews://secnews.netscape.com:563/netscape.mozilla.user.unix
Note that you need to have SSL enabled and the port set to 563.
--
Orbit3+1 [and 3m], Orbit Retro from : http://themes.mozdev.org
Latest : http://deskmod.com/?show=showcat&cat_name=mozilla