Re: Seeking Qt port maintainer or Qt removal

morbit _at_ cdn.gs wrote:
> Christopher Seawood wrote:
> 
>> Roland Mainz wrote:
>>
>>> There aren't much changes required to get the Qt port working again,
>>> there are only two major changes which are easy to fix (if someone has
>>> Qt installed).

What are these two major changes that should be implemented? I'll be 
willing to give this a go. I think there are people on at least this 
list who will be willing to participate as well - provided we have some 
guidance to get our heads around this beast.

>> Compiling != working port.  I'm looking beyond just getting the Qt 
>> port compiling again.  I'm looking for someone to "own" this port; to 
>> be the "go to" person, so to speak.

I'll be willing to play the role, provided I can get some help just 
getting the thging into a usable state again - this seems to be the 
biggest stumbling block, not providinbg the actual time. In my eyes this 
is one thing that should not be scrapped.

Greetings,
Jaco