Re: Seeking Qt port maintainer or Qt removal

Jaco Greeff wrote:
> Answering my own question...
> 
>>>>> There aren't much changes required to get the Qt port working again,
>>>>> there are only two major changes which are easy to fix (if someone has
>>>>> Qt installed).
>>>>
>>
>> What are these two major changes that should be implemented? 
> 
> 
> 1. Take bero's original patch for 1.0rc2 and fix it up to allow for the 
> qt option to work again.

It seems to be mainly new members in the printing area that hos been 
added to the GTK/X interfaces that are missing in the QT. Members such 
as getPaperSizeInTwiips() and so on. They seem pretty straightforward to 
implement... I can post a pacth on my (rough) implementations so far.

This weekend I will download a qtlib.a and see if it can compile. Then 
on to QT3.

If it helps any, perhaps we can drop support of qt and only keep qt3? 
Would that bother a lot of people?

regards, Esben

P.S: Folowup to mozilla.qt...