Re: [Camino] the new zoom: the real zoom
Noemi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.chimera,gmane.comp.macosx.camino.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Personally, I think fit-to-content is more important for fluid layouts than for fixed-width (although how one determines what fit-to- content is for a fluid layout is beyond me). But zooming to full screen on a fluid layout is a nightmare. Long line lengths are very difficult to read (there's plenty of research out there to support this), and most fluid layouts don't limit them. It's extremely difficult to read a maximized fluid-layout page at any resolution higher than 1024x768. At 1600x1000, it's impossible. Just my 2c. -Noemi On Nov 17, 2006, at 7:43 AM, Sebastian Winkler wrote: > Finally, in the latest branch build, Camino has taken to exhibit the > mac-typical window-zoom: fit-to-contant rather that full-screen. > A true milestone! > > I must say though, that for not fixed-width layouts (pages that > reflow the contents according to window-width) the full-screen > behaviour would seem to be the only sensible thing. Wouldn't a hybrid > approach, depending on the nature of the page, be the best solution? > Also, right now zooming a window with a frameset doesn't seem to > avail to anything (though sometimes Camino takes to augmenting the > window-width for approx. 20px per click) > > Regards to all, > Sebastian > > _______________________________________________ > Camino mailing list > [email protected] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino