Re: RFC7512 PKCS#11 URI support
David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.crypto |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 12:49 -0400, John Dennis wrote: > > If the API does not have documented behavior constraints then you can't > be causing a API breakage. I think that's overstating the case a little. Even if the behaviour is undocumented, if real applications are depending on it in anything other than a completely crack-inspired fashion then we shouldn't break them. I speak of the general case, of course. In *this* case, nobody's managed to offer any examples of where an application might feed a valid PKCS#11 URI as a "nickname" to one of these functions, and *depend* on the failure they currently get. Not even as a wild hypothetical. -- dwmw2 -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 5.6 KB) - not displayed