Re: Cipher suits, signature algorithms, curves in Firefox

Peter Bowen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.crypto
Message-ID <CAK6vND8SB0br=PvVdjV+KJPS+dc_G+7K9FBmiCZiQ0GMAicupQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Brian Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Zoogtfyz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 3) DHE (not ECDHE) cipher suits are far too often implemented incorrectly,
>> most often with default common DH primes, DH parameter reuse, or generally
>> weak bitstrenght (equivalent to 1024bit RSA, which is already considered
>> insecure in Firefox). Hence it's better to remove support for DHE (not
>> ECDHE) cipher suits rather than give false sense of security.
>>
>
> I agree. I think if people want non-ECC DHE cipher suites, then at a
> minimum we need to define new cipher suite IDs for them that imply keys of
> at least 2048 bits. Unless/until that happens, they are more trouble than
> they are worth.
>
> Note that Chrome recently reached the same conclusion.

Is a reasonable path to implement
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-10 and
treat ECDHE suites as being DHE using a Supported Group?  This would
avoid new cipher suite IDs and accomplish the same result.
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.