Re: valgrind reporting memory in use - expected?

Calling those functions should be sufficient I think.

I'm not sure about all the leaks. But some of them look familiar. There's a
bug open for parts [1]. (I dropped the ball on that but we should get that
landed soonish.)

Cheers

[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187421

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Ian Pilcher <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm working on a C program that uses libnss to update certificates in a
> mod_nss database.  Using valgrind to check for memory leaks, and I am
> seeing 8 blocks that are still in use when the program exits, all of
> which were apparently allocated by NSS_InitReadWrite().
>
> ==6798== HEAP SUMMARY:
>> ==6798==     in use at exit: 1,382 bytes in 8 blocks
>> ==6798==   total heap usage: 1,777 allocs, 1,769 frees, 565,345 bytes
>> allocated
>> ==6798== ==6798== 6 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
>> 1 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2DB9D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
>> ==6798==    by 0x5075B33: _PR_InitLinker (prlink.c:192)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507BCE2: _PR_InitStuff (prinit.c:206)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: _PR_ImplicitInitialization (prinit.c:219)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:774)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BED76: nss_Init (nssinit.c:580)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
>> 2 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2DB9D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507BAB2: PR_ErrorInstallTable (prerrortable.c:169)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507BD11: _PR_InitStuff (prinit.c:212)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: _PR_ImplicitInitialization (prinit.c:219)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:774)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BED76: nss_Init (nssinit.c:580)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
>> 3 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2DB9D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507BAB2: PR_ErrorInstallTable (prerrortable.c:169)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C4A1: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:778)
>> ==6798==    by 0x66678D6: NSS_InitializePRErrorTable (errstrs.c:38)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BF10B: nss_InitModules (nssinit.c:380)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BF10B: nss_Init (nssinit.c:689)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
>> 4 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2FA50: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
>> ==6798==    by 0x603066E: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:141)
>> ==6798==    by 0x602FFA1: dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (dlopen.c:87)
>> ==6798==    by 0x5076903: pr_FindSymbolInProg (prmem.c:98)
>> ==6798==    by 0x5076903: _PR_InitZones (prmem.c:154)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507BBA2: _PR_InitStuff (prinit.c:144)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: _PR_ImplicitInitialization (prinit.c:219)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:774)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BED76: nss_Init (nssinit.c:580)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== 40 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
>> 5 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2FA50: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
>> ==6798==    by 0x5075B21: _PR_InitLinker (prlink.c:190)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507BCE2: _PR_InitStuff (prinit.c:206)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: _PR_ImplicitInitialization (prinit.c:219)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:774)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BED76: nss_Init (nssinit.c:580)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record
>> 6 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2DB9D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
>> ==6798==    by 0x50849B2: PR_NewCondVar (ptsynch.c:321)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BE61C: nss_doLockInit (nssinit.c:539)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C4A1: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:778)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BED76: nss_Init (nssinit.c:580)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== 168 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss
>> record 7 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2FA50: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
>> ==6798==    by 0x508490C: PR_NewLock (ptsynch.c:142)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BE608: nss_doLockInit (nssinit.c:535)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C4A1: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:778)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BED76: nss_Init (nssinit.c:580)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss
>> record 8 of 8
>> ==6798==    at 0x4C2FA50: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
>> ==6798==    by 0x5075702: _PR_InitTPD (prtpd.c:65)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507BC96: _PR_InitStuff (prinit.c:172)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: _PR_ImplicitInitialization (prinit.c:219)
>> ==6798==    by 0x507C491: PR_CallOnce (prinit.c:774)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BED76: nss_Init (nssinit.c:580)
>> ==6798==    by 0x54BFC18: NSS_InitReadWrite (nssinit.c:832)
>> ==6798==    by 0x404828: init_libnss (umn.c:1191)
>> ==6798==    by 0x40552C: main (umn.c:1424)
>> ==6798== ==6798== LEAK SUMMARY:
>> ==6798==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==6798==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==6798==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>> ==6798==    still reachable: 1,382 bytes in 8 blocks
>> ==6798==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
>>
>
> I am currently calling NSS_Shutdown(), PL_ArenaFinish(), and
> PR_Cleanup() during program shutdown.
>
> Is there anything else I should be doing to clean up?
>
> --
> ========================================================================
> Ian Pilcher                                         [email protected]
> -------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" --------
> ========================================================================
>
> --
> dev-tech-crypto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
>
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto