Re: Using the Priority Field for Roadmap tracking
Markus Adrario <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:38:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Philipp, I think it's a good idea, since it helps to identify important bugs and see where work is most valuable. Your suggestion ho to treat P1-3 sounds god to me. Markus Am 17.02.2014 23:23, schrieb Philipp Kewisch: > In an effort to make project work more transparent, I was thinking of > ways I could make it more clear where I would like to go with the > calendar project. > > I was often asked what the roadmap is and I usually started with > "Since we aren't very many developers, there are no specific > deadlines...". I have a few things I want to do first, like fix the > tests and ical.js integration, but I don't know when these will be > completed. In consequence, tracking bugs by target milestones will > only have us moving bugs from one to the next. > > The devtools team uses the priority field for tracking their bugs. As > far as I've seen, they use P1, P2 and P3, with these meanings: > > P1: very important or blocking others > P2: important > P3: valuable, can wait > > I think it would make sense to do something similar for Calendar. > Devtools has a rule that P1 and P2 bugs MUST have an assignee. I think > this will be hard for us to manage, we would end up with only P3 bugs. > I think we should relax this rule so that P1 bugs SHOULD have an > attendee, and P2/P3 bugs MAY have an attendee. Alternatively we could > drop the rule altogether. > > I don't suggest marking all bugs with P1/P2/P3 at once, its perfectly > fine to leave bugs without a priority. Instead, I would start marking > a few bugs P1, then we can go from there. > > We could also set up a roadmap page (on the website, or MDN if > possible) that automatically retrieves the P1/P2/P3 bugs and displays > them, possibly with a motivational text encouraging developers to help > out with the P1/P2 bugs if they really want to help, or at least aim > for the P3 bugs. > > What do you think about this? Counterproposals? Slight changes? If no > one objects in a week or two, I will start marking bugs P1 as mentioned. > > Philipp > >