Re: How are bugs prioritized?

Oracle is saying they don't put the "X-RECEIVED-SEQUENCE and X-RECEIVED-DTSTAMP" in the calendar either.

When lightning encounters multiple x-received-sequence numbers it  locks up and stops responding. It's 100% not usable until you fix the multiple x-received-sequence numbers on the server. So far, the only way to do that is to delete the event.

After that, you have to start Thunderbird in safe-mode and use the config editor to delete the calendar, restart tb and then recreate the calendar.

Can the priority be increased to a p1-3?

Karl


On Monday, October 27, 2014 1:03:12 PM UTC-5, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> On 10/25/14 9:11 AM, kfr- wrote:
> > On Friday, October 24, 2014 8:55:13 PM UTC-5, kfr- wrote:
> >> I have a lightning bug that I need fixed. I don't have the skills to fix it myself. The bug was reported by someone else on 2013-05-24. I'm willing to test the fix.
> >>
> >> I'm wondering how bugs are prioritized.
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875739#c3
> > 
> 
> Hi Karl,
> 
> the Mozilla Calendar Project is made up of a group of volunteers which
> all have their own interest. I am not mandating any specific priority in
> fixing bugs, but I try to advocate for anything that improves stability,
> performance or test coverage.
> 
> I've checked for X-RECEIVED-SEQUENCE and X-RECEIVED-DTSTAMP in our code,
> and we don't produce these parameters either. Therefore it must come
> from a different source. While it is unfortunate that this hangs
> Lightning, I wouldn't say its a priority at the moment.
> 
> That said, it may not be terribly hard to fix so with a certain amount
> of luck a developer may be able to pick this up.
> 
> Here is a list of current priorities:
> 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=-prio%3A--%20prod%3Acalendar&columnlist=priority%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc&order=priority%2Cassigned_to&list_id=11453464
> 
> Philipp