Re: LDAP SDK and source repositories

Rich Megginson wrote:

> Moving to Mercurial is fine with me.  I've been using git now for quite 

:-)

> some time and have really grown to like how much better it is than CVS. 
>  I understand hg is similar to git.  As far as the repo layout, it 

Yes, afaik.

> doesn't matter to me if the c-sdk has its own top level repo or is part 
> of a larger repo, as long as it is easy to
> 1) checkout just the c-sdk
> 2) build just the c-sdk
> 3) tag individual and separate c-sdk releases
> 4) produce individual source code releases of the c-sdk

Then you do want a separate c-sdk repo.
(And you can use the repoNestedRepositories/subrepos feature on top of 
it, if need be: see my previous message.)


Then it should be much like what was done for DOMi and Venkman:
import with (some) history.
Time to confirm the filed bug?