Re: LDAP SDK and source repositories

On 28/07/2009 06:49, Serge Gautherie wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> doesn't matter to me if the c-sdk has its own top level repo or is
>> part of a larger repo, as long as it is easy to
>> 1) checkout just the c-sdk
>> 2) build just the c-sdk
>> 3) tag individual and separate c-sdk releases
>> 4) produce individual source code releases of the c-sdk
>
> Then you do want a separate c-sdk repo.

No, he's saying it doesn't matter.

> Then it should be much like what was done for DOMi and Venkman:
> import with (some) history.
> Time to confirm the filed bug?

No. Please be patient - like I said this is a non-urgent issue. I'd 
especially like to give Mark, Anton and Dan time to respond as well.

Standard8