Re: Changing a protocol state based on returned values

Chris Jones wrote:
> Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> Until this change lands, I'd recommend defining your protocol as you 
> want it, but leaving the "start" keyword commented out, like
> 
>   /*start*/ state NORMAL:
> 

Never mind this --- I just committed dummy syntax that allows you to write

   start state NORMAL:

if you want.

Cheers,
Chris