Re: Implementing the web timing spec
Christian Biesinger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.dom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+zhiheng Smaug wrote: > On 2/11/10 8:28 PM, Christian Biesinger wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> there's a specification for exposing detailed timing information of web >> page elements via the DOM: >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebTiming/ >> >> Some people here would like to implement it in Firefox. The reason for >> exposing it via the DOM is to gather actual concrete end-user timings; >> other approaches don't allow that (also not all of this timing data is >> currently available to extensions). >> >> The idea is to change the spec a bit to limit the number of elements on >> which this data is exposed, probably to drop the Ticks interface, etc. > So quite a few changes are needed, as I expected. > > >> >> Would people agree this is useful, and in particular, would the DOM >> peers be willing to accept patches to implement this spec? > > Timing is useful sure, but *I* am not sure that the *draft* spec is > even close to something which should be implemented. > > But sure, IMO, patches should be accepted if and when the specification > is stable and reasonable enough. Sure, the spec is being improved. If you have concrete feedback, I'm sure Zhiheng would love to hear it :) We also don't have to implement the spec completely from the start, we can implement the more reasonable parts first. -christian >> Chromium is implementing this spec as well >> (https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2009-October/010382.html). >> For >> a bit of discussion on the spec, see the thread at >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07393.html >> >> -christian >