Re: Node's __proto__
"Eric J. Van der Velden" <[email protected]> Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.dom |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <3b67bdd0-5ac8-45f5-b776-a0e6091863c9@h20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
On Mar 16, 8:30=A0pm, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/16/12 3:15 PM, Eric J. Van der Velden wrote: > > > I understand for example that > > Node.prototype.__proto__=3D=3D=3DObject.prototype, but although > > uninteresting, I still would like to know what I should write on > > the ... in Node.__proto__=3D=3D=3D....prototype. > > Per future specs, Node.__proto__ =3D=3D=3D Function.prototype, since Node= is a > Function object. > > In Gecko's current implementation, it depends. =A0In the new DOM bindings, > the interface object's proto should be Function.prototype. =A0In the > XPConnect bindings (which Node is at the moment, but hopefully not for > much longer), I have no idea offhand. > > > Because Object is a function, Object.__proto__=3D=3D=3DFunction.prototy= pe. > > So I thought: Function.__proto__=3D=3D=3DFunction.prototype. I thought > > Function in JavaScript similar to Object in Java. But it is not true. > > Function.__proto__ =3D=3D=3D Function.prototype, yes. > > Node is special, because it's actually a host object at the moment. > > > Also what do you mean by "each prototype has a flattened version of > > all methods and properties it inherits"? > > That wasn't relevant to your question; it was about Node.prototype. > > -Boris Hi Boris, Thank you very much. Function is defined in SpiderMonkey. Where is Node defined? Thanks, Eric J.