Re: The future of binary embedding

"Grant Gayed" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.embedding
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Benjamin,

> As a project, we aren't going to spend effort trying to solve the problems 
> associated with in-process embedding.

Can you clarify what this means?  Is it just referring to the dropping of 
gtkmozembed/javaxpcom/ActiveX control?  Or is it saying that once mozilla 
has entered the multi-process world that in-process embedding like can 
currently be done via typical XPCOM will no longer be possible?

Thanks,
Grant


"Benjamin Smedberg" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Last summer, I led a session at the Mozilla summit to discuss whether and 
> how we ought to continue supporting our various embedding efforts 
> (gtkmozembed, javaxpcom, the ActiveX control, the NSView embedding widget, 
> etc) given the effort involved in preserving their various degrees of code 
> and binary compatibility with Mozilla core. We came the following 
> conclusions:
>
>    * Embedding Mozilla rendering into other processes is a tough
>      problem. We never solved it fully, and each embedder has had to
>      spend lots of time tweaking things.
>    * Firefox is the key product of the Mozilla project; to the extent
>      that supporting embedding takes away from Firefox, we should
>      strongly prioritize Firefox.
>    * Binary compatibility of our embedding bindings is a high cost
>      which is not worth the benefits.
>    * As we move Firefox into a multiple-process model, the embedding
>      solution we really want is very different from the one we
>      currently have: we really want embedders to be simple containers
>      for a separate Firefox process which would do the actual web
>      rendering.
>
> Because of this, I'm planning on making the following changes in our code:
>
>    * Remove gtkmozembed and its supporting code. The promise of
>      gtkmozembed was a binary-compatible wrapper that GTK applications
>      could use to easily get web rendering into their application.
>      Without significant supporting code to deal with profiles,
>      certificates, prompts, and other details, this code doesn't work
>      correctly, and is unmaintained.
>    * Remove javaxpcom and its supporting code.
>    * Remove the ActiveX control and plugin, and the IDispatch code
>      which was created to support interconnecting the ActiveX code with
>      our DOM.
>
> Various people have expressed interest in taking of maintenance of these 
> embedding solutions, but I lost their email addresses in a recent computer 
> crash. Anyone with interest should please email me, and I will happily 
> work with you to set up a Mozilla repository for the continued maintenance 
> of these projects.
>
> As a project, we aren't going to spend effort trying to solve the problems 
> associated with in-process embedding. Once separate-process rendering is 
> implemented in Firefox, we may consider ways to make really simple 
> multi-process embedding a possibility. If you are interested in helping to 
> begin implementation of this multiprocess embedding solution, please let 
> me know, and I will help guide you in the right direction.
>
> --BDS
> Module Owner, Embedding
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.