Re: jsdIFilter?

James Ross wrote:
> "John J. Barton" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]...
>> Does anyone know if jsdIFilter works?  I guess I could try it, seems 
>> like a good thing if it worked...John.
> 
>  From inspection, it appears that it will work for all the callback 
> hooks except scriptHook. Venkman has a mini-example/test in 
> http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/ident?i=cmdTestFilters. No guarantees 
> on its stability, though, as I don't know of anything that actually uses 
> it (besides that mini-test in Venkman).
> 
> Would be great if you can report back on if it works, doesn't work or 
> takes down the world in a ball of fire. ;)

Thanks for your information. Unfortunately the only case I really need 
is scriptHook :-(.  The big overhead in Firebug is caused because the 
only way to sort out scripts is to have a stack and scriptHooks do not 
have a stack. So I have to take the scriptHook and set a breakpoint to 
get a stack.  I thought I could pay back some of the overhead if I could 
filter scriptHook calls to focus only on the ones that need processing.

John.