Re: Fusion Laws?

Michael Haufe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jseng
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 5:26:17 PM UTC-5, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 3/30/16 6:17 PM, Michael Haufe wrote:
> > In general yes. The exceptions are of course idempotent ones like dom calls which are constant after creation (window.self perhaps?), and innocuous side-effects that are never used:
> >
> > xs.map(function(x){
> > var d = Date.now(); //side-effect
> > var r = Math.random(); //side-effect
> > return x
> > });
> 
> The problem is that it's hard to prove functions are side-effect-free in 
> JS, in even this weak sense.  For example, your function there might do 
> absolutely anything, depending on what's been done to the Date and Math 
> properties on the global.  :(

It's a shame there isn't an Attribute Grammar definition for the semantics of ECMAScript, it might make this a bit more tractable...

I found a related thread on es-discuss:
<https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-November/thread.html#26657>

I think Brendan said it best. To paraphrase: we'd be eaten by a grue if we tried.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.