Re: 2 questions
Jerry Talkington <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.macosx |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 12:30:55AM -0500, Homer J. Fong wrote: > > 2. Will Mozilla ever ditch the "user profile" model? With OS X, and > everyone having an individual account, this is no longer necessary. It > also makes it a pain to have a "master profile" on a master disk image > (configured with all the bookmarks and preferences you want). When the > image is copied to the client computer, it insists on making a new user > profile. All the other browsers don't have this problem. No, multiple profiles are very necessary. Users with one profile (should) never get prompted to select a profile, so it's seemless to them. However, multiple profiles are useful for many things such as: a) Moz Developers. They can try out code fixes, etc. without blowing away their day to day browsing preferences. b) Themers. They can test out new themes in a clean profile, to make sure they work. c) Extension developers, for testing. d) People using VPNs to access private lans via the Internet (e.g. I have separate profile for browsing internal work sites from my house/laptop via a proxy, but I don't want Internet traffic to go through the work proxy. A proxy.pac isn't possible, because private IP address and names conflict on my home LAN conflict with work.) I'm sure there are plenty of other uses that I haven't listed, but there really is no compelling remove this functionality. If it's not seemless to a user with a single profile, then that's a bug. -- GPG public key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9D5B8762