Re: 2 questions

Jerry Talkington <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.macosx
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 12:30:55AM -0500, Homer J. Fong wrote:
>
> 2. Will Mozilla ever ditch the "user profile" model? With OS X, and
> everyone having an individual account, this is no longer necessary. It
> also makes it a pain to have a "master profile" on a master disk image
> (configured with all the bookmarks and preferences you want). When the
> image is copied to the client computer, it insists on making a new user
> profile. All the other browsers don't have this problem.

No, multiple profiles are very necessary.  Users with one profile
(should) never get prompted to select a profile, so it's seemless to
them.  However, multiple profiles are useful for many things such as:

a) Moz Developers.  They can try out code fixes, etc. without blowing
away their day to day browsing preferences.

b) Themers.  They can test out new themes in a clean profile, to make
sure they work.

c) Extension developers, for testing.

d) People using VPNs to access private lans via the Internet (e.g. I
have separate profile for browsing internal work sites from my
house/laptop via a proxy, but I don't want Internet traffic to go
through the work proxy.  A proxy.pac isn't possible, because private IP
address and names conflict on my home LAN conflict with work.)

I'm sure there are plenty of other uses that I haven't listed, but there
really is no compelling remove this functionality.  If it's not seemless
to a user with a single profile, then that's a bug.

-- 
GPG public key:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9D5B8762
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.