Re: small phi font problem
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.mathml |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <3db7b031-8dd0-474d-ba0c-8c05dbeacd9f@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> |
Hi Bill, On Feb 2, 9:58 pm, William F Hammond <[email protected]> wrote: > > I suppose most of us interested in math know the LaTeX names > \phi (straight) and \varphi (curly). > > The current (version 2) xhtml+mathml dtd flags U-03C6 as varphi > (a name from LaTeX) and U-03D5 as straightphi. Those characters > display in my -u8 xterm as the DTD indicates and in a way > that is consistent with the "stixgeneral" beta font. > > However, their display in mathml segments by Firefox 2 with pre- > stixbeta Mozilla-recommended fonts, both in linux and windows, has > always been reversed for me. (One of those old fonts must have it > wrong.) > > Question 1. Why use the plane 1 versions rather than U-03C6 and > U-03D5? Will the version 3 DTD reflect this change? > Since I am using mathml generated by MathType (Design Science) with swapped phi fonts and Firefox 2 used to swap them again for mathml (before the STIX fonts), I've got everything right. But I agree, that using the same convention for embed phi font in a text and for mathml expressions does make more sense. One has only to make sure that this convention will be adapted by other browsers with mathml support, as Opera (Firefox 3 will take over Firefox 1). IE and MathPlayer should probably have to make some changes. > > Question 2. Is there a reasonable way for a Firefox user to > determine what font provides the glyph under the mouse in > her display? I was thinking that the browser could easily swap among the glyphs for a mathml expressions only, by using CSS or other means. I am still puzzled why FireFox 3, using the same STIX fonts, renders the phi differently on Windows and on Mac ? Cheers, Samy