Re: hand-wave-y cache performance data
Doug Turner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.netlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fwiw, we disabled cache on mobile (again) for 2-3 perf bugs. I think we are the only mobile browser in the Android Market that doesn't have a disk cache. I am sure that is going to show up in both performance benchmarks as well as power benchmarks. Is there a plan to rewrite our cache -- making it modern? IIRC, the necko cache was written back in the late 90's - a time when disk space and cpu cycles were more expensive. If there isn't a plan, we need one. I don't think continued investment into the necko cache is something we should be doing. Doug On Jan 10, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 1/10/12 8:26 PM, Jason Duell wrote: >> The take-away would seem to be that we're not doing anything really >> horrible (yay), and are competitive with IE/Opera, but we could >> improve somewhat (Chrome tends to be faster). Nothing earth- >> shattering or market-defining, IMO. > > The main take-away for me was that for uncached loads of big complex pages we do pretty comparably to Chrome, but for cached ones we're way slower.... > > -Boris > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-network mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network