Re: cache effectiveness testing
Patrick McManus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.netlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
assuming you want to measure the benefit/savings of response caching you don't want to bypass dns and connection setups - while variable, they are a big part of the caching savings and the reason you want to cache! you also need to measure/model it across a variety of RTTs - the benefit varies according to the network - and decide what ranges are important to you. Which makes sense becuase the value of caching a slow object is higher than caching a fast object. (and I personally think that should be part of the cache-replacement function.) Cache benchmarks taken over unshaped lans and localhost are just silly - its all overhead without any upside. If you're just trying to measure overhead, that's another story. On 1/20/2012 11:29 PM, RIUM+ wrote: > Since we're just trying to isolate the impact of caching& nothing > else, it may be advisable to perform an initial run through the sites > in a Private Browsing session, to prime the network connection. This > would remove variability related to caching DNS requests& other > network issues. That can easily add a few hundred milliseconds of > delay to whichever software package you test first (in this case > Firefox run 1). > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-network mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network