Re: another cache perf article

On 02/22/2012 11:58 AM, Taras Glek wrote:
> See 
> http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/chrome-17-firefox-10-ubuntu,3129-6.html
>
> I *think* they are restoring sets tabs from bookmarks and we might be 
> getting nailed by our big cache lock.
>

Yeah it's not clear from the description if they load them all at once, 
or time each page serially.

If you eyeball the uncached vs cached load times per site, the yahoo 
results are interesting:

   
http://media.bestofmicro.com/S/L/326325/original/uncachedpageloadwindetailwbgp9.png
   
http://media.bestofmicro.com/R/Q/326294/original/cachedpageloadwindetailwbgp9.png

I don't know what chromium does that makes their cached load of yahoo so 
fast.   A 3x speedup for Chrome vs just 1/3rd faster for us.