Re: Proposal: we add new bugzilla component for webRTC stuff?
Patrick McManus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.netlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The logical distinction is transport headers vs content headers. I think the network owner and peers should decide issues related to transport (Connection headers, cache headers, transfer headers, delimiter related headers, etc..) but someone closer to Firefox / Thunderbird / etc should set those for U-A, Content, etc.. (perhaps differently from other products). On 2/26/2012 9:57 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > > I don't think "HTTP Headers" is a good module to have. Content team (for Accept-*) or Necko team (everything else except User-Agent) is the one that should "own" most of the other headers, and to make it simple, we might as well keep them in Necko. User-Agent is the only header that Necko team would say good riddance to, AFAICT. > > Cheers, > Brian > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-network mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-network