Re: SSL telemetry very early grain of salt edition
Gervase Markham <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:14:15 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.netlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 29/11/12 16:23, Patrick McManus wrote: > We use SSL3 instead of TLS in handshakes 1.13% of the time. That's more > than I hoped, but less than brian feared :) As in, 98.87% of the time we use TLS? We only support 1.0 at the moment, right? > 1.7% of OCSP queries fail to generate an OCSP response. Can we get info on which responders are performing poorly, or is that not included for privacy or size reasons? > OCSP responses take a median 310ms to complete. That is pretty darn terrible. > The "Time to Ready" metric for a new connection using ssl (which would > include the TCP handshake and SSL handhake which may or may not be resumed > or require OCSP), has a median around 400ms. Plaintext HTTP has a > time-to-ready around 110ms. Is it a coincidence that the difference between these two figures is very close to the above-mentioned 310ms? No wonder Chrome switched it off... Gerv