Re: Credentials and connection pools

I think saying that anonymous and non-anonymous requests can share a
connection in most cases is fine - but that when connection auth is present
those connections cannot carry anonymous requests. I believe that satisfies
the need without talking about various bits of protocol versioning and
reuse strategies.

In general I think the previous mistake made (in various documents) was
overspecifying things about the transport and this is unwinding it. I
wouldn't unwind it by making it even more specific.

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Patrick McManus <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I think what you describe (as more aggressive) would be a fine gecko
> > implementation.
>
> I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1363284.
>
>
> > Hopefully fetch would say something much more generic?
>
> Could you explain why it's not desirable to describe this in more
> detail? It sounds like you don't agree with my preconnect example and
> giving developers a guaranteed contract to write code against, but you
> didn't really address it.
>
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>