Re: NSPR assertion failure
Julien R Pierre - Sun Microsystems <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:54:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.nspr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sreedhar, errno would be in your libc. Probably /usr/lib/libc.so or somethnig like that . rv is in libnspr4.so . But you need to be in the right frame and in the right thread in the debugger in order to be able to print it . Is your version of gdb handling threads properly ? I wonder because it's reporting "New process xxx". Old versions of gdb had many problems with threads on Linux. I don't know about your CentOS. If you can't get anything useful from the core file, just add printf's. It should work for this case. [email protected] wrote: > Hello Julien, > > When I tried to print the values for rv and errno, gdb complained > saying No symbol for these variables in current context. > > I used symbol-file command with all the nspr libraries. and then ran > the command core with the core file. > > Which library has these variables. > > What I did is, > > (gdb) symbol-file nss/lib/libnspr4.so (I tried with other library > files of nspr also) > Reading symbols from /opt/TroposControl/ems/nss/lib/ > libnspr4.so...done. > (gdb) core core.23903 --------> after this it output lot of stuff. > ....... > ....... > [New process 23905] > [New process 23904] > [New process 23903] > #0 0xb7ff7402 in __kernel_vsyscall () > (gdb) print rv > No symbol "rv" in current context > > Thanks, > Sreedhar > On Mar 26, 4:26 pm, Julien R Pierre - Sun Microsystems > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> [email protected] wrote: >>> Hi Julien, >>> I am running this on CentOS 5. This is part of the Java Server. Where >>> should I see the core file. I didn't find one. I searched entire file >>> system for the core >>> What would be the file name. >> I know nothing about CentOS - I had never even heard of it before your >> post. core file administration is not very standardized. As Kyle >> mentioned, you may not have gotten one because of limits. >> >> It's also possible the name of the core has been renamed to something >> else, or relocated. On Solaris and recent versions of other Unix >> platforms, there is a command called "coreadm". See if it exists for >> your OS. >> >> Since the assertion is on a system function, I would also recommend you >> obtain the latest OS patches, especially those relating to the pthread >> library. This might fix your problem. >> >> Using the latest NSPR release version also probably would not hurt, >> because if there is a bug, we probably won't fix it in 4.6.x, but rather >> 4.7.x / 4.8.x . >