Re: m68k does not imply m68020-60
Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:24:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.nspr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJeAr6uTwgg2dtOHwyDUCaPv=1CG_ZJQ-mZuRxLPLDBgk0XA+A@mail.gmail.com> |
On 26 November 2015 at 11:39, Wan-Teh Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> wrote: >> Having the compiler generate m68020-60 instructions made running on my >> coldfire very difficult :-( I think it is better to just honour the >> compiler. > > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for the post. I did a search for "m68k" in the NSPR source > tree. I believe you are referring to this m68k case in the > configure.in script: > > 1859 m68k) > 1860 CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -m68020-60" > 1861 CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -m68020-60" > 1862 ;; > > The revision history shows this was added in 1999 and 2002: > > https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nspr/rev/29227fdc9a15 > https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nspr/rev/879b717836d9 > > I think we should just delete the m68k case from the configure.in > script. Agreed? Yes. I thought I'd attached the below which does just that: --- nspr-4.10.9/nspr/configure.in.orig 2015-11-25 15:17:14.732725317 -0500 +++ nspr-4.10.9/nspr/configure.in 2015-11-25 20:09:38.299725384 -0500 @@ -1857,8 +1865,4 @@ fi ;; - m68k) - CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -m68020-60" - CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -m68020-60" - ;; esac ;; thanks. Andrew > Wan-Teh