[OT] file systems
Steve Wendt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.os2 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/07/2016 11:06 PM, Dave Yeo wrote: >> The HPFS support in Linux is also very good > > Also uses EAs for symlink and permissions so is actually compatible > with OS/2+klibc Using EAs for symlinks predates klibc by years; klibc initially did something incompatible, and I was at least one of the people that requested it be changed to match. > Ubuntu here seems to see HPFS fine but has problems writing to it and > always leaves the disk dirty. Never had that problem, but I don't use Ubuntu, nor have I accessed HPFS under Linux in recent years. I wouldn't be surprised if that's a Ubuntu-created problem (they tend to do their own thing). Conversely, the ext2 IFS for OS/2 worked really well for read/write once upon a time, but it's incompatible with the ext3/ext4 journaling and only works in read-only mode. Apparently it also has some problems with LVM, and some have suggested even read-only doesn't work with partitions created with newer tools. Partition Magic was a really nice tool upon a time; it's too bad they dumped HPFS before they added any Linux file system support. Of course, it's all ancient history now, thanks to the devouring beast known as Symantec. > I used to have a DOS HPFS driver Never had much luck with those. > Tried pinball.sys under Win2k, which worked well until I fed it a > drive bigger then 4.3GBs, and then it erased the root directory Oops. :(