Re: Seamonkey profile
Dave Yeo <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Jul 2018 22:10:51 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.os2 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/17/18 10:02 PM, Christer Jacobsson wrote: > Dave Yeo wrote: >> Christer Jacobsson wrote: >>> Dave Yeo wrote: >>>> On 09/30/17 11:00 PM, Dave Yeo wrote: >>>>>> Yes, She wants the flattest possible dir trees for the SM and FF >>>>>> profiles, for example: >>>>>> >>>>>> R:\MOZILLA and under that >>>>>> PROFILES\SEAMONKEY\CHRISTER (The new profile(S)for SM should go under >>>>>> PROFILES\SEAMONKEY\<other profile)> >>>>>> PROFILES\FIREFOX\CHRISTER (The new profile(s) should go under >>>>>> PROFILES\FIREFOX\<new profile>. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this possible and how should the new SET MOZILLA_HOME be set? >>>>> >>>>> I don't know if it is possible. You'd need to set MOZILLA_HOME=R:\ and >>>>> test. It _should_ work but I've seen Firefox have problems downloading >>>>> to the root of drives. >>>>> If I remember, I may test later >>>> >>>> Tested, set MOZILLA_HOME=H:\ and ran Firefox and SeaMonkey. >>>> Under the root, 3 subdirectories, Extensions, Firefox and SeaMonkey. >>>> Extensions is empty, meant for extensions installed for all profiles I >>>> think. >>>> Firefox and SeaMonkey have the usual structure, profiles directory >>>> then profile >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>> >>> OK, then She can create the structure as shown above, but what will >>> happen when She upgrades SMpMW118 to SM 2.1? >> >> Good question. It has been so long since I used the migrator that I >> can't remember if you have a choice where the old profile lives. >> You're probably going to have to experiment and possibly manually >> migrate. >> Dave >> > > Tnx for the suggestion above in this post. But would it be simpler just > crating the r:\mozilla.org, setting and let the migration do the rest, > probably the recreating the new profile in a subdir in the original tree? > > It would be worth trying. It's been so long since I used the migrator that I can't remember how it works. At the worst you will have to try again. Anyways good to hear from you Dave