Re: Seamonkey once again

Harald Kamm wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 05:17:08 UTC, Dave Yeo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oh. Sounds like your running out of shared memory, perhaps an update to
>> libc or libcx has made it worse.
> Apparently it does. Thanks for all your hints, it seems to work afaics. But I would have
> preferred a less sophisticated approach.

Well we're running huge fairly modern programs, and SM is big, on an OS 
that was developed 30 years back and development basically stopped 15 
years back after slowing right down 25 years back. It was originally 
designed to only give a process 512 MBs minus DLLs and the high memory 
support is buggy.
The fact that it mostly works is actually pretty amazing.
Dave