Re: Seamonkey usage

Hi

[email protected] wrote:
> ** Reply to note from [email protected] Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:00:01 +0000
>>
>> Message: 1 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 11:02:49 -0700 From: Ray Davison <[email protected]> To:
>> [email protected] Subject: Should I try OS/2 SM again? Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>
>> Several years ago, under eCS 2.1 I tried to get to a website with SM,  and all I got was a black page with a pinwheel in
>> the middle. At that  point I decided life was too short for such "challenges", and stopped  trying to shop under eCS.
>
>  Likely was a FF version issue, not an OS one.
>
>> The last time I tried to run SM under OS/2 I apparently either did not  have all the pieces, and/or did not have them all in
>> the correct places.  My question is; should I again try to go shopping with OS/2? I have  eCS 2.1. Should I be able to get
>> SM to do mail and get to almost all  sites, except maybe need FF to get to Chase?
>
>  I do online transactions with ECS and non-current FF.  The issue with SM or FF is adding required libraries (dll files). ANPM
> should take care of that if you don't wish to install manually. If you do want manual, use pmdll to determine missing dll
> files.
>


Even better for manual install: visit 
http://os2news.warpstock.org/Warpzilla.html and download support files 
in zip packages.


Regards

Pete



>  Falkon browser will soon be here, possibly making Mozilla browsers irrelevant. As for Chase, is it doing a user agent
> string test? Some stupid sites do not realize there are many names for mozilla browsers, expecting Firefox in string.
>
>         Cal
>
>