Re: Plugin whitelist
"David E. Ross" <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:14:05 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.plugins |
|---|---|
| Organization | I am @ david at rossde dot com. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/3/2014 11:43 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > On Friday Chad posted and blogged about our proposed plugin whitelisting > policy. > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Plugins/Firefox_Whitelist > https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/02/28/update-on-plugin-activation/ > > The primary goal of this policy is to give plugin vendors who are > working on moving towards HTML5 solution some additional time to make > the transition, as well as providing feedback from plugin vendors to our > web API teams about features missing from the web platform. We will > continue to preserve user security by keeping engineering and QA > contacts for each plugin vendor. > > Please ask questions/provide feedback by replying to > mozilla.dev.tech.plugins. > > --BDS > Can users whitelist plugins that are identified in the user's Helper Applications list? Will this be automated? Can I whitelist plugins globally instead of for specified URIs? I have some plugins that are used by a large number of Web sites. It appears that the AVG SiteSafety plugin (npsitesafety.dll) operates on ALL Web sites. My concern is about non-Mozilla developers who do not want to bother with applying for whitelisting but whose products are quite useful. -- David E. Ross <http://www.rossde.com/> On occasion, I filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam, flames, and trolling from that source.