Re: NPAPI replacement for those of us who still need system API access

EL <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.plugins
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015 02:07:30 UTC+2 schrieb Chris Peterson:
> On 10/9/15 1:38 PM, Richard Bateman wrote:

> The proposed solution is to create a Firefox extension that talks to 
> native code. The APIs listed below are some options.
> 

What about drawing native windows in the browser? I mean windows which really need to be native?

And, since it it a major argument that NPAPI is insecure, because it makes it possible to call native code with access to the system - how much more secure is the approach to create an extension that calls native code? It seems to lead the argument ad absurdum, that NPAPI is insecure (which I think is not really true anyway, because it is the same as saying: "all computer programs are insecure, because the C/C++ API has access to the system").

-- 
EL