Re: NPAPI replacement for those of us who still need system API access
EL <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.plugins |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015 02:07:30 UTC+2 schrieb Chris Peterson: > On 10/9/15 1:38 PM, Richard Bateman wrote: > The proposed solution is to create a Firefox extension that talks to > native code. The APIs listed below are some options. > What about drawing native windows in the browser? I mean windows which really need to be native? And, since it it a major argument that NPAPI is insecure, because it makes it possible to call native code with access to the system - how much more secure is the approach to create an extension that calls native code? It seems to lead the argument ad absurdum, that NPAPI is insecure (which I think is not really true anyway, because it is the same as saying: "all computer programs are insecure, because the C/C++ API has access to the system"). -- EL