Re: abook location

Neo Geshel wrote:
> Janwillem van Dijk wrote:
> 
>> but for Windows 2000 on FAT32
> 
> 
> Don't care much about security or performance, do you? I know, it's 
> Windows, but you don't have to leave your ass flapping in the wind on 
> purpose, you know. Move to NTFS, and you close some pretty serious 
> security holes and increase performance at the same time.
> 
> Sorry, I just had to comment. It's been a long time since I've heard of 
> someone actually using FAT32 with any version of NT. It's like buying a 
> Ferrari (in the Window's world, at least) with a 90Hp 4-cylinder engine 
> and no door locks, much less a security system. FAT32 under NT - IMHO, 
> the mark of a computer newbie, to be sure.
> 
> Apologies for being off topic.
> ...Geshel

Well, actually educated in the years that ALGOL60 was brrranddd new. 
However, you are quite right of course but sometimes compromises do not 
end up with the best solutions one could think of; btw I would not 
compare w2k with any sophisticated cars but again compromises have to be 
made sometimes.

So, any tips on the abook.mab problem still very much apreciated.
Janwillem