Re: RDF being phased out?

Axel Hecht wrote:
> As I've mentioned before, there isn't a clear definition of RDF, I 
> suspect that different folks want different things. Like, to me, RDF is 
> a dynamically typed aggregated directed labeled graph, and RDF/XML is a 
> bug. I've seen other opinions, too.

Axel, by RDF/XML do you mean the document format?

If so I quite agree - the [immense] value we get from RDF is the 
aggregated graph.  All our triples are being stored in SQLite anyway so 
the document format to us is irrelivant.  Though I had assumed 
manipulating the triples would be the hard part rather tha parsing an 
XML doc.


N