Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles

Patrick Finch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 4/24/2015 8:15 PM, Chris Hofmann wrote:
>> - ask the user to approve each new type of suggestion
> this seams like it would get pretty annoying.
>
> It might be better to just give users a menu of the types of content we
> have to offer, and they could check off would like to see mixed in among
> their tiles.


Something like the Discover feature in Opera's new tab?
http://www.operasoftware.com/press/reviews/desktop#discover

I find that instinctively interesting as a product direction, but at the 
moment, Opera Discover seems to be basically a fairly coarse-grained 
news feed, lacking the kind of specificity that makes it interesting.   
(Opera Discover has 1 tier of interest categories and 1 tier of 
geographic preference)

Patrick



>
> That also greatly reduces the need for so much inference out of there
> browsing history, and any problems that might turn up in not being able to
> get that right.
>
> -chofmann
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Ed Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [ For context around Suggested Tiles, please read
>> http://ed.agadak.net/2015/04/whys-and-hows-of-suggested-tiles ]
>>
>> Similar to how we iterate on code to make Firefox faster, more usable, or
>> more functional; we would like to improve on user trust and transparency
>> for Suggested Tiles.
>>
>> The current state of Suggested Tiles in Beta 38 is that Firefox only shows
>> suggestions that match a hardcoded set of top-sites-matching logic. This
>> was done to allow people to verify the source code and have some guarantees
>> around what Firefox can and cannot do.
>>
>> One particular attack this implementation prevents is the arbitrary
>> querying of Firefox top sites data. In the situation that Mozilla did not
>> follow its policies, Firefox could be tricked to show a fake suggestion and
>> report back if the user has visited a specific site.
>>
>> However, this hardcoding approach limits the ability to make better
>> suggestions or improve them quickly. For example, if Firefox only has a
>> predefined "News" matching logic, it wouldn't be able to match on users who
>> are more interested in "Technology News," so if there's a great technology
>> news recommendation, Firefox would show it to way too many people who
>> aren't interested in technology. A related issue is if for some reason a
>> non-news site was put as part of "News," users could get quickly annoyed by
>> seeing things that aren't actually relevant until the next update of
>> Firefox fixes the bug.
>>
>> So assuming that the user control to easily turn off the Suggested Tiles
>> functionality is not enough, what technical measures could be used to
>> improve transparency to help users verify that Mozilla is not doing
>> anything malicious?
>>
>> Here's some initial ideas of what Firefox could do, and I hope people can
>> provide some more:
>>
>> - support specialized update mechanisms
>> - ask the user to approve each new type of suggestion
>> - verify with multiple (non-mozilla?) servers before making suggestions
>> - notify the user of incoming changes a day in advance
>> - allow the user to specify a whitelist/blacklist of sites
>>
>> Ed Lee
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-planning mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.