Re: Improving trust and transparency for Suggested Tiles
Patrick Finch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/24/2015 8:15 PM, Chris Hofmann wrote: >> - ask the user to approve each new type of suggestion > this seams like it would get pretty annoying. > > It might be better to just give users a menu of the types of content we > have to offer, and they could check off would like to see mixed in among > their tiles. Something like the Discover feature in Opera's new tab? http://www.operasoftware.com/press/reviews/desktop#discover I find that instinctively interesting as a product direction, but at the moment, Opera Discover seems to be basically a fairly coarse-grained news feed, lacking the kind of specificity that makes it interesting. (Opera Discover has 1 tier of interest categories and 1 tier of geographic preference) Patrick > > That also greatly reduces the need for so much inference out of there > browsing history, and any problems that might turn up in not being able to > get that right. > > -chofmann > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Ed Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [ For context around Suggested Tiles, please read >> http://ed.agadak.net/2015/04/whys-and-hows-of-suggested-tiles ] >> >> Similar to how we iterate on code to make Firefox faster, more usable, or >> more functional; we would like to improve on user trust and transparency >> for Suggested Tiles. >> >> The current state of Suggested Tiles in Beta 38 is that Firefox only shows >> suggestions that match a hardcoded set of top-sites-matching logic. This >> was done to allow people to verify the source code and have some guarantees >> around what Firefox can and cannot do. >> >> One particular attack this implementation prevents is the arbitrary >> querying of Firefox top sites data. In the situation that Mozilla did not >> follow its policies, Firefox could be tricked to show a fake suggestion and >> report back if the user has visited a specific site. >> >> However, this hardcoding approach limits the ability to make better >> suggestions or improve them quickly. For example, if Firefox only has a >> predefined "News" matching logic, it wouldn't be able to match on users who >> are more interested in "Technology News," so if there's a great technology >> news recommendation, Firefox would show it to way too many people who >> aren't interested in technology. A related issue is if for some reason a >> non-news site was put as part of "News," users could get quickly annoyed by >> seeing things that aren't actually relevant until the next update of >> Firefox fixes the bug. >> >> So assuming that the user control to easily turn off the Suggested Tiles >> functionality is not enough, what technical measures could be used to >> improve transparency to help users verify that Mozilla is not doing >> anything malicious? >> >> Here's some initial ideas of what Firefox could do, and I hope people can >> provide some more: >> >> - support specialized update mechanisms >> - ask the user to approve each new type of suggestion >> - verify with multiple (non-mozilla?) servers before making suggestions >> - notify the user of incoming changes a day in advance >> - allow the user to specify a whitelist/blacklist of sites >> >> Ed Lee >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-planning mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-planning mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning