Re: Potential privacy issues of not showing suggestions in certain contexts
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABcZeBP6AKV-y8pYq0pRNBjqTkPeZj0sN7f2CWufZdXi9bDtbw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 7:35:35 PM UTC-7, Andrew Sutherland wrote: > > A possibly good/possibly bad side effect is that this could allow the > > brands to not explicitly say which websites they don't want to be > > associated with. > This concept has come up in some discussions around whether it's okay for > us to ship a list of adult/porn sites as clear text with Firefox. If we do > want to prevent users from having a list of questionable sites on their > computer, using a bloom filter can indeed avoid the problem. > > Having a list could power other features such as porn-browser or the > opposite with parental-control browser. Although not quite the topic of > discussion here. > > Do people have thoughts on whether it's okay to have a plaintext list of > sites either as source or packaged as part of Firefox? Is there a reason not to use the same techniques we use for safe browsing? -Ekr