Re: Potential privacy issues of not showing suggestions in certain contexts

Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey
Message-ID <CABcZeBP6AKV-y8pYq0pRNBjqTkPeZj0sN7f2CWufZdXi9bDtbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 7:35:35 PM UTC-7, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
> > A possibly good/possibly bad side effect is that this could allow the
> > brands to not explicitly say which websites they don't want to be
> > associated with.
> This concept has come up in some discussions around whether it's okay for
> us to ship a list of adult/porn sites as clear text with Firefox. If we do
> want to prevent users from having a list of questionable sites on their
> computer, using a bloom filter can indeed avoid the problem.
>
> Having a list could power other features such as porn-browser or the
> opposite with parental-control browser. Although not quite the topic of
> discussion here.
>
> Do people have thoughts on whether it's okay to have a plaintext list of
> sites either as source or packaged as part of Firefox?


Is there a reason not to use the same techniques we use for safe browsing?

-Ekr
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.