Re: The future of Linux32 builds and tests

I think ADI is likely the only reliable metric here, if FHR and Telemetry
are disabled by Linux distributions. That said, if folks have examples of
Linux distros explicitly disabling these features, please let me know.
Unless they've got written permission to disable those features, they
shouldn't be doing that.  And ultimately it's self-defeating, as it means
Linux users (and their use cases) won't be measured or prioritized
effectively.

-- Mike

On 9 October 2015 at 09:23, Robert Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mike Hommey schrieb:
>
>> Debian is likely not very indicative of the overall Linux world. Taking
>> the primarily available figures from Debian and Ubuntu give completely
>> opposite pictures:
>> debian: i386: 51859, amd64: 132362
>> ubuntu: i386: 2065695, amd64: 673565
>>
>
> And even other distros may give yet different numbers. For example, for
> the openSUSE Leap distro, 32bit will not even be an officially supported
> architecture any more, only x86_64 will be. Unfortunately, I have no clue
> if Fedora, RedHat, openSUSE, Arch and others even do have numbers like you
> point out above.
>
> KaiRo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-planning mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>