Re: Triage Plan for Firefox Components
Milan Sreckovic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey,gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.platform,gmane.comp.mozilla.firefox.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Mar 31, 2016, at 18:22 , Daniel Veditz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Milan Sreckovic <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I’m going to start and keep arguing that we do not want to have an explicit name for that largest bucket of “wishlist” bugs, and should instead have it marked by the absence of a tag. > > What distinguishes a bug that has not been triaged from a bug that has been triaged and (mentally?) put into the third bucket if there's no explicit marker? I understood there was an “untriaged” status set by default. On the other hand, the latest choice of “backlog” is non-confrontational enough that, for the purposes of the naming discussion, is close enough to “blank" for me not to argue. — - Milan _______________________________________________ dev-planning mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning