Re: Mozilla Windows CE Development
Gangadhar NPK <[email protected]> Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:15:02 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.small-devices |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Doug, There is another effort going on - Mozilla SVG, wherein they propose to create much richer (in terms of looks ) UI. Of course, all this via XUL too. Will that be something that would be thought of for minimo ? That said, I think WTL will (if not anything else) will make the code size smaller and the RSS competitive. I haven't looked at the code thoroughly, but will share my thoughts once so. What do you think about this ? Doug Turner wrote: > Mateusz Ĺoskot wrote: > >> In article <[email protected]> Gangadhar NPK wrote: >> >>> To be able to use XUL for embedded devices would take a lot of >>> effort. But by doing this, a UI layer as feature rich and yet not >>> very large (minus few features most of the time) would be possible. >>> The XRE http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xul/xre.html is another major >>> initiative by the project. And if minimo can help it get there it'll >>> be great. >>> >> >> >> Yes, XUL on Pocket PCs would provide developers with a new >> development grade. >> But, in the meantime, I think employing WTL for Minimo UI development >> is easier to push and WTL would make Minio developmen simplier on >> Pocket PC. >> >> Greets > > > In the short term, native front-ends is where we are at. In the long > term, we may want to be using XUL. > > With that said, right now I am using Win32 for my UI. Basically > "mozilla" just draws into a child window. If we think that wtl is the > way to go, I am all for it. > > Regards, > Doug