Re: Mozilla Windows CE Development

Gangadhar NPK <[email protected]> Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:15:02 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.small-devices
Organization Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Doug,
There is another effort going on - Mozilla SVG, wherein they propose to 
create much richer (in terms of looks ) UI. Of course, all this via XUL 
too. Will that be something that would be thought of for minimo ?
That said, I think WTL will (if not anything else) will make the code 
size smaller and the RSS competitive. I haven't looked at the code 
thoroughly, but will share my thoughts once so.
What do you think about this ?

Doug Turner wrote:

> Mateusz Łoskot wrote:
> 
>> In article <[email protected]> Gangadhar NPK wrote:
>>
>>> To be able to use XUL for embedded devices would take a lot of 
>>> effort. But by doing this, a UI layer as feature rich and yet not 
>>> very large (minus few features most of the time) would be possible. 
>>> The XRE http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xul/xre.html is another major 
>>> initiative by the project. And if minimo can help it get there it'll 
>>> be great.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, XUL on Pocket PCs would provide developers with a new
>> development grade.
>> But, in the meantime, I think employing WTL for Minimo UI development
>> is easier to push and WTL would make Minio developmen simplier on 
>> Pocket PC.
>>
>> Greets   
> 
> 
> In the short term, native front-ends is where we are at.  In the long 
> term, we may want to be using XUL.
> 
> With that said, right now I am using Win32 for my UI.  Basically 
> "mozilla" just draws into a child window.  If we think that wtl is the 
> way to go, I am all for it.
> 
> Regards,
> Doug