Re: firefox renders html differently on two 'identical' machines? (SOLVED)

Andrew Schultz <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:06:23 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.unix
Organization Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Message-ID <[email protected]>
walt wrote:
> Andrew Schultz wrote:
>> walt wrote:
>>> It would be nice if the browser would announce that a page can't
>>> be rendered because of the font size <sigh>.
> 
>> Erm.  "can't" ?  Why would you want this?  It would be totally annoying
>> and everyone would certainly disable the notification after a few times.
> 
> Heh.  Maybe I'm just weird (my wife says I am) but I just wasted
> many hours of my time trying to find out why I couldn't read a
> web page.  I don't know enough about html to know whether this
> unfortunate rendering behavior is a 'feature' or a bug.
> 
> Perhaps you could visit the URL and experiment with different
> settings for 'minimum font size' and tell me if you think firefox
> 'does the right thing'.  My opinion is:  rendering a page that
> can't be read is not a reasonable default -- at least there should
> be a warning popup that explains the reason for the illegibility.

The "default" minimum font size is "none" and with that the page is 
quite readable.  It remains readable up to 13 pixels.  At 14, the bar on 
the right side shifts to the left and covers up part of the page.  I 
don't know why, but is almost certainly not designed to look right at 
that setting.  But firefox certainly has no way of knowing that the bar 
moved because of the minimum font size, or that it's undesired.  14 
pixels is a pretty big minimum font size and will substantially alter 
most pages you visit.

-- 
Andrew Schultz
[email protected]
http://www.sens.buffalo.edu/~ajs42/