Re: What's the Big Deal with Firefox?
Ron Hunter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.windows |
|---|---|
| Organization | Another Netscape Collabra Server User |
| Message-ID | <crtgb1$kfb1__2462.26169770143$1105348270$gmane$org@ripley.netscape.com> |
Ed Mullen wrote: > Ron Hunter wrote: > >> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote: >> >>> Ed Mullen wrote: >>> >>>> Daniel Wagner wrote: >>>> >>>>> Flatfoot wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They seem to be pushing Firefox over Mozilla for some reason, so I >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The reason I prefer using a combination of Firefox and Thunderbird >>>>> is their compactness. There is much less so-called "feature >>>>> bloat", because they are stripped down to the very basics. Any >>>>> additional features can be added by installing extensions. >>>>> Mozilla, on the other hand, comes with everything, including a >>>>> number of applications that I currently don't use and probably >>>>> never will use. (For example, there is bundled a web-authoring >>>>> program and an IRC client, as well as a few other things.) The >>>>> result is a smaller, faster program that is more closely tailored >>>>> to my personal uses. >>>>> >>>>> ~d >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Small note: the IRC client (Chatzilla) can be not installed when >>>> choosing the Custom installation. >>>> >>>> As for me, I prefer the Suite and the integration. I rarely use the >>>> Composer component but it does come in handy once in a while. >>>> Mostly I compose my Web pages using a plain-text editor. But I do >>>> forget some little-used HTML tags and I can use Composer to quickly >>>> gen up something and then "steal" the code. Very handy. >>>> >>>> The footprint of the Suite and the FF/TB combo is not all that >>>> different. The memory footprint difference, likewise, is not not >>>> large and, in my opinion, not terribly significant on a modern >>>> system with a large hard drive and (the typical) 512 Mb of RAM. >>>> >>>> To each his own. >>>> >>> A man after my own heart. I have both Mozilla and FireFox. I use >>> Mozilla 99.999% of the time. >>> >>> That .001% of the time for FireFox I use it just when I need to view >>> an item on a website really fast and intend to just turn on computer >>> just for this purpose and then shut down again as soon as I through. >>> >>> For me there is exactly no difference >>> >> My sentiments, exactly, only exactly the opposite. My computers, >> except for the laptop, are always ON. >> I find Mozilla Suite to be like working with gloves, compared to FF. > > > Ain't it nice to have such choices? !!! ;-) > > Indeed it is. That's why we have Ford and Chevrolet, and Toyota and Honda.