Re: What's the Big Deal with Firefox?

Ron Hunter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.windows
Organization Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Message-ID <crtgb1$kfb1__2462.26169770143$1105348270$gmane$org@ripley.netscape.com>
Ed Mullen wrote:
> Ron Hunter wrote:
> 
>> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T wrote:
>>
>>> Ed Mullen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Flatfoot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> They seem to be pushing Firefox over Mozilla for some reason, so I
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason I prefer using a combination of Firefox and Thunderbird 
>>>>> is their compactness.  There is much less so-called "feature 
>>>>> bloat", because they are stripped down to the very basics.  Any 
>>>>> additional features can be added by installing extensions.  
>>>>> Mozilla, on the other hand, comes with everything, including a 
>>>>> number of applications that I currently don't use and probably 
>>>>> never will use.  (For example, there is bundled a web-authoring 
>>>>> program and an IRC client, as well as a few other things.)  The 
>>>>> result is a smaller, faster program that is more closely tailored 
>>>>> to my personal uses.
>>>>>
>>>>> ~d
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Small note:  the IRC client (Chatzilla) can be not installed when 
>>>> choosing the Custom installation.
>>>>
>>>> As for me, I prefer the Suite and the integration.  I rarely use the 
>>>> Composer component but it does come in handy once in a while.  
>>>> Mostly I compose my Web pages using a plain-text editor.  But I do 
>>>> forget some little-used HTML tags and I can use Composer to quickly 
>>>> gen up something and then "steal" the code.  Very handy.
>>>>
>>>> The footprint of the Suite and the FF/TB combo is not all that 
>>>> different.  The memory footprint difference, likewise, is not not 
>>>> large and, in my opinion, not terribly significant on a modern 
>>>> system with a large hard drive and (the typical) 512 Mb of RAM.
>>>>
>>>> To each his own.
>>>>
>>> A man after my own heart. I have both Mozilla and FireFox. I use 
>>> Mozilla 99.999% of the time.
>>>
>>> That .001% of the time for FireFox I use it just when I need to view 
>>> an item on a website really fast and intend to just turn on computer 
>>> just for this purpose and then shut down again as soon as I  through.
>>>
>>> For me there is exactly no difference
>>>
>> My sentiments, exactly, only exactly the opposite.  My computers, 
>> except for the laptop, are always ON.
>> I find Mozilla Suite to be like working with gloves, compared to FF.
> 
> 
> Ain't it nice to have such choices?  !!!  ;-)
> 
> 
Indeed it is.  That's why we have Ford and Chevrolet, and Toyota and Honda.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.